My friend, Dr. Ugi Soeharto has different answer. In Malaysia, the question faced by Islamic bank is Can Islamic bank do what conventional banks do? while in Indonesia, the question is more specific and somewhat underestimating: What is different Islamic bank from their conventional counterpart?
It means that Malaysian Islamic banks need only to answer yes to the question and start arranging their products similar to what is in conventional banks. The only different between their products are in the label “i” (islamic).
At the same time, Indonesian Islamic banks should provide the answer in two level. Firstly, it should have the product that similar to conventional bank, so as to answer the first question, whether Islamic banks can operate in the market. Second, it should show how different the products are from their conventional ones. Once people find no different in both products they abruptly judge that no use of Islamic bank here, since they cannot have specialty in Islamic bank. The logical consequence from this judgment is that, no noeed to go to Islamic bank and have their service.
This basic start is just an indicator how Islamic banks in Indonesia struggle to be accepted in their own community, the muslim community which form 90% of population. Compared with their counterpart in Malaysia, they are really what is called as “one man show” or “home alone”. In Malaysia, Government support is very high, from tax incentive for Islamic banking products (and finance) until special (huge) fund provided for developing Islamic banking worldwide.

Leave a comment
Comments feed for this article